Categories

Archives

Greenworks Realty

Ben Kaufman and Danielle Johnson from Greenworks Realty came to our most recent Pinehurst Planning and Development Group meeting. They are real estate agents who also believe in building sustainable communities. Check out their web site for information on sustainable building practices, what you can do to make your home greener, and on their agency, Greenworks. Also, check out Danielle’s posts on the Seattle PI’s Building Seattle Green blog.

Are you and your neighbors prepared for a disaster/large scale emergency?

The City of Seattle has developed the SNAP Program (Seattle Neighborhoods Actively Prepare) to help Seattle residents prepare for any potential emergency.

One special aspect of this program is that it is about neighbors working with neighbors to prepare and to assist each other in an emergency such as earthquakes, floods, power outages, and major storms.

For more information go to: http://www.seattle.gov/emergency/programs/snap/

Or – come to:

Meadowbrook Community Center
10517 35th Ave NE
Tuesday, December 11th
7:30 – 9:00 PM

Seattle Great City Initiative

Seattle Great City Initiative is a new non-profit organization led by Mike McGinn, Greenwood neighborhood activist, attorney and leader in the Washington State chapter of Sierra Club.

Their mission statement is that they are environmentalists, neighborhood leaders, business people, and citizens working together to enhance our quality of life, help preserve our region’s natural beauty, and make Seattle a model of economic and environmental sustainability.

For more information, see http://www.greatcity.org/.

Flexcar in Pinehurst?

Would you use a Flexcar if we had one in Pinehurst?

If so, please write to Gabriel Scheer at gabriel.scheer@flexcar.com and ask him for a Flexcar in Pinehurst and tell him that you would use it.

Flexcar wants to hear from Pinehurst folks who would use a car and they need to hear from enough folks to know that it would make business sense for them to place a car in our neighborhood.

Pinehurst Planning and Development Group – October 2007 Meeting

The next meeting of the Pinehurst Planning and Development Group will be Wednesday, 10/10 from 6:30 – 8 PM. For location and additional information, please contact Renee at 206-366-9472.

We are very grateful to welcome Stella Chao, Director, Seattle Department of Neighborhoods, and Ed Pottharst, North District Coordinator, Seattle Department of Neighborhoods, to the meeting.

Listening Campaign – Status
Members of the Pinehurst Planning and Development Group (PPDG) who attended our first meeting in August will recall that we agreed to engage in a listening campaign in the neighborhood. All who want to participate in PPDG on an active basis agree to reach out to 15 – 20 people to tell them about the group, ask them what they like and don’t like about Pinehurst and what they would like to see happen in the neighborhood in the future. Anyone who is interested inthe group is welcome to join us at our next meeting.

If you are running shy of the required 15 – 20 contacts, please let me know. I could use volunteers to help me with community meetings (small ones – over coffee) that are being organized with residential groups, churches and other groups in the neighborhood.

Mayor Nickels’ Sidewalks Proposal

Mayor Nickels has announced proposed changes to land use rules regarding sidewalks:

Sidewalks Proposal
It is the City’s goal to ensure a safe, contiguous, and geographically appropriate pedestrian network throughout the city. The sidewalk proposal is intended to further that goal by ensuring that new development contributesappropriate pedestrian infrastructure commensurate with the increase inpedestrians associated with new housing and other development.

The Proposal
The Mayor is proposing revisions to sidewalk requirements as they currently exist in the Land Use Code. Current regulations include thresholds and exceptions that exempt development projects of a certain size or type from building sidewalks. As a consequence, some types of multi-family and otherdevelopment are occurring without the infrastructure to support theresulting increase in population density. The proposed revisions aim to correct this inequity by revising the code to focus on the highest priorityareas for sidewalk improvements, as follows:

  • Sidewalk requirements would be determined initially by the location of the proposed project, providing an opportunity to target improvements to the highest priority areas of Urban Centers, Urban Villages, parcels within pedestrian designated zones, and parcels adjacent to arterials.
  • Project thresholds would be reduced to zero in the high priority areas listed above; and projects proposing three (3) or more dwelling units in all other areas. Thresholds for commercial space would be eliminated, thereby requiring sidewalks of all commercial developments regardless of size.
  • Nearly all of the current exceptions for street improvements would no longer apply to sidewalks, and would instead be replaced with two new exceptions for additions and remodels of a specific size. Current Environmentally Critical Areas regulations would remain applicable where warranted by proposed project location.

Northgate Way Rezone Proposal

The City and Northgate community representatives have been discussing the possibility of upzoning properties along or adjacent to a portion of Northgate Way (from Meridian Avenue to Roosevelt Way) to help encourage and focus additional residential and mixed-use development in this corridor. As a result of an upzone, density and heights (up to 125 feet) would be increased.

A map of the potential rezone area and additional information is available here.

Sidewalks on 115th and 125th

Pinehurst residents applied for funding from the Neighborhood Street Fund Large Project Fund (funded by the Bridging the Gap transportation levy) to build sidewalks on 115th (between 15th and 5th NE) and 125th (between Roosevelt and 5th NE).

These sidewalks were rated a high priority in the Northgate Coordinated Transportation Investment Plan (see ES-7 and ES-11) for pedestrian safety and efficiency and for neighborhood preservation.

Many more projects were applied for in the city than can be funded. However, Pinehurst neighbors can vote for these projects at community forums that will be held in Spetember:

Tuesday, 9/11, 5-8 PM
Ravenna-Eckstein Community Center
6535 Ravenna Ave NE

Thursday, 9/20, 5-8 PM
BF Day Elementary School
3921 Linden Ave N

The project application IDs are: 2007-530, 2007-531 and 2007-065 and can be seen in this list of city wide applications.

For a recent Seattle PI article on sidewalks and the upcoming community forums link here.

For facts on the Neighborhood Street Fund program and the review process link here and here.

Pinehurst Playfield Shelterhouse

A number of neighbors have been working to secure funding for renovation of the Pinehurst Playfield Shelterhouse (located in Pinehurst Playfield at 12029 14th Ave NE). It is hoped that the shelterhouse will be used as a neighborhood gathering and meeting space once renovations are completed.

The Seattle Department of Neighborhoods Large Project Fund awarded the project $39,000 and King County (with the help of Councilmember Bob Ferguson and his Legislative Aide George Allen) awarded the project $45,000. Also, Friends of Pinehurst Playfield donated $10,000 to the renovation project. We now have a total of $94,000 to upgrade the shelterhouse.

For more information or to get involved with this project, please contact:
Lorna Mrachek at lamrachek@msn.com or at (206) 366-8338.

Proposed Approach for Updating Seattle Neighborhood Plans

[THE FOLLOWING MATERIAL ACCOMPANIED THE DEPUTY MAYOR’S JULY 5 PRESENTATION TO CITY COUNCILMEMBER CLARK’S COMMITTEE ]

DRAFT
Proposed Approach for Updating Neighborhood Plans
July 2007

Update neighborhood plans by geographic sector (6 sectors overall). Determine the order of sectors to review by applying the following criteria:

1. Amount of household and employment growth, relative to the current growth targets
2. Significant changes that have occurred but were not anticipated by the earlier plans within the sector
3. Overall effectiveness or completeness of current plan in the sector

City staff would lead and provide professional support for the updates (DPD as the planning lead, with participation of DON, SDOT, Parks, OH and other departments and non-City agencies as necessary for each plan).

More standardization of plans – format and topics. All plans would address:

o Land use
o Transportation
o Housing
o Environment/open space
o Capital facilities
o Utilities
o All of these topics would be considered within overarching themes of sustainability and connectivity

Plans could include, where appropriate, one or more of these optional elements: Public Safety, Social services and Human Needs, Arts/Culture, Urban Design, Economic Development and Recreation.

Before beginning on any neighborhood plan, City staff would compile two major background reports:

· Citywide summary of relevant policy documents and plans that guide future actions (e.g. Comprehensive Plan, Transportation Strategic Plan, Urban Forest Master Plan, Comprehensive Drainage Plan, etc.)

· Background report that includes information on household and job growth patterns, demographics, recent and planned public investments, zoning / development capacity for each urban village in the sector.

Public Involvement

· Early stakeholder engagement to refine proposed approach.
· Each sector would be completed in one year, through structured public involvement. Approximately 2-3 meetings per neighborhood, and 1-2 per sector.
· Each sector and urban village with a plan being updated would be represented by an advisory group.
· The sector advisory group would meet to assess issues that cross boundaries of urban villages in the sector.

Council Process

· Council briefings on sectors selected; early issue identification
· Neighborhood plans submitted to Council for final action

Proposed Schedule* for Updating Neighborhood Plans

2008

January Sector analysis complete; choose first sector for planning based on criteria (level of growth, adequacy of current plan)

January Begin Background Reports

1. Citywide report on existing policies and plans (e.g., Comprehensive Plan, Transportation Strategic Plan, etc.) that will be basis for neighborhood plans

2. Sector-specific report for first sector, including e.g.:
– Household/job growth patterns
– Demographics
– Investments since plans adopted
– Local social issues
– Environmental concerns and opportunities

April Use sector report to:
– Identify sector-wide and local issues for plan
– Compare each village in a sector to criteria for deciding appropriate level of effort for each neighborhood

June Conduct sector-wide orientation on process, background, goals for first sector

June Convene advisory committee for each village doing an update in first sector

October Identify key issues, with each village advisory committee

November Brief Council on preliminary issue identification

*Note: 2008 schedule assumes the approach is finalized and adequate resources are provided by the end of 2007.

2009

January Check-in with sector-wide advisory committee regarding common issues for first sector

March Choose second sector, begin work on background report

June Conduct sector-wide orientation on process, background, goals for second sector

July Finish first sector plans

August Recommend amendments to Neighborhood Planning Element of the Comprehensive Plan for neighborhoods in the first sector.

Second and subsequent sectors will follow a schedule similar to the one for the first sector.